Floating Question Marks

My name is Carissa. I am a proud feminist and I hold science to be my source of truth.


ASK BOX   Submit
Reblogged from atheismforthewin
Reblogged from sexisnottheenemy
Just as young people need scientifically accurate sex education to keep them safe, so we need accurate relationship education to keep us sane. In order to move forward constructively, we need a multiplicity of relationship models to inspire and reassure us. We need trans couples on TV, we need non-monogamy champions, we need people married 40-plus years like my parents, and we need Stevie Nicks who, at 62, is purposefully single so that she can “always be free”. Jessica Mack (Women can be independent and intimate | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk  (via joyousfeminism)

(via inhellsdespair)

Reblogged from ihopericksantorum
bboy-yung-buck:

ihopericksantorum:

Boom.

Can everyone just reblog this once?

bboy-yung-buck:

ihopericksantorum:

Boom.

Can everyone just reblog this once?

(via andmyparalyzingfearofdeath)

Reblogged from christiantheatheist
Reblogged from tooyoungforthelivingdead
lacigreen:

settin the record straight

lacigreen:

settin the record straight

(Source: tooyoungforthelivingdead, via whitedenial-ontrial)

Reblogged from ihateallyourgods
ihateallyourgods:

Doubt those who find it

ihateallyourgods:

Doubt those who find it

(via inhellsdespair)

Reblogged from decivitate
There are huge efforts that do go into making people, to borrow Adam Smith’s phrase, “as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human being to be.” A lot of the educational system is designed for that, if you think about it, it’s designed for obedience and passivity. From childhood, a lot of it is designed to prevent people from being independent and creative. If you’re independent-minded in school, you’re probably going to get into trouble very early on. Education Is Ignorance, Noam Chomsky (via decivitate)

(via amodernmanifesto)

Reblogged from lunaradvent
Reblogged from broadist
Sometimes, loving your body is not an option. Sometimes, the best we can do is accept our bodies as the changeable, beautiful, frustrating vessels they are. That’s OK. Expecting yourself to have a full-on love affair with your body at all times is asking too much. Bodies are occasionally annoying. What we can do is know them, and decide for ourselves when they feel good, and when they feel less good, and what we might do to make them feel better again. Even if we can’t love our bodies, we can make sure we don’t hate them. Lesley Kinzel (via sugaryumyum)

(Source: broadist, via zombieproduce)

Reblogged from reallyfoxnews
There’s an old saying that I’m a big fan of: Never try to teach a pig to sing — it wastes your time and annoys the pig. I think of this every time I get the urge to lash out at Fox News for some irresponsible, grossly unethical thing or other that the network has done or has had the gall to broadcast under the guise of being a real news organization. My criticism, like everyone else’s, won’t matter one bit — the attack will just bounce off of Roger Ailes’s prodigious belly like he was Kung-Fu Panda. Not only does Fox News not fret over its many detractors and their grievances, it generally welcomes the outrage as an opportunity to once again let its pit-bullish media relations department off the chain to maul the crap out of the poor bastard with the bad sense to hassle its master… It’s with all of this in mind that I sit here wallowing waist deep in what I know is the futility of saying a damn thing about Fox News’s latest nakedly obvious and indefensibly biased attack on Barack Obama. If you haven’t seen what I’m talking about yet — the four-minute video clip that Doocy the Clown and the rest of the crew of local news rejects on Fox & Friends aired earlier this week, benignly calling it a “look back” at the last three years of the Obama presidency — then I’m not going to go into detail for you. Suffice it to say that you really do need to see it with your own eyes to both believe it and — eventually, after it sinks in that you really are watching what you think you are — appreciate the sheer scope of its horribleness. It’s not news. It’s not even news by the very flexible standards of Fox News. At the risk of violating Godwin’s Law, it’s 1939-style propaganda and nothing more — not a thing more — and it quite frankly stands as Fox News’s darkest hour. It’s honestly so freaking shameless that even I wasn’t sure Fox was capable of creating and disseminating something like it, despite the fact that anyone as cynical as I am should’ve understood fully that it merely represents the Fox model taken to its logical conclusion. Chez Pazienza for the Huffington Post, in Fox News Doesn’t Care About Your Outrage. (via reallyfoxnews)

(via reallyfoxnews)

Reblogged from theworldisconfused

Reblogged from ultimatehumor
religiousragings:

Cosmopolitan

religiousragings:

Cosmopolitan

(Source: ultimatehumor)

Reblogged from inbetweenillustrations
Reblogged from foreverliberal
Reblogged from abaldwin360